« Adam Newton Interviews Ek-sen-trik Discordians | Main | Teen and Preteen Birth Control in Portland Maine »

Bush Fights Against Children Getting Health Care

After the U. S. Congress approved a bill to fund health care for children in low-income family, President George W. Bush vetoed it.  It was only his fourth veto during his almost seven years in office, showing it's something he's very strongly against.

The SCHIP measure had bi-partisan support.  The Senate approved it with enough votes to override the veto, but an attempt in the House of Representatives failed on Oct. 18, 2007.

Now, they're talking about a compromise.  Meanwhile, children who need medical attention may not be getting it.  Bush's primary argument has been that helping low-income children won't leave funds for poor children.  Meanwhile, the average American taxpayer has spent thousands of dollars to fund the military and its War in Iraq, which has resulted in chaos and the deaths and financial ruin of a great number of people.

But Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif, said those pushing for the coverage might consider a compromise. "As long as the bottom line is that 10 million children are covered.  That's nonnegotiable."

Read an article about this at the Chicago Tribune site at http://www.chicagotribune.com/features/lifestyle/health/chi-kidshealth19oct19,1,4284377.story

For links and comments on the history of this bill, see http://loveshade.org/blog/2007/09/bush_plans_to_veto_kids_health.html#more

- - - - -

To see more entries related to health care, click http://loveshade.org/blog-mt/mt-search.fcgi?IncludeBlogs=1&search=health+care

With the possible exception of the European Union (which consists of a number of countries), the United States of America is the wealthiest union in the world. Yet, according to the World Almanac and a study by the United Nations, America has the highest infant mortality rate and the lowest average life span of any nation in the industrialized world. Something is wrong. Children are not getting the health care they need. If the current adminstration wants them to get that care through private insurers, then they can subsidize those insurers, control rates, or cut taxes so that people can afford it.

President Bush has been a major proponent of "No Child Left Behind" in education. What about being left behind in their very survival?

See update as of Oct. 30, 2007 at http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20071031/ap_on_go_co/children_s_health


[ Yahoo! ] options

Comments

So Bush is continuing his fight against America's children? First it's the totally irresponsible and unworking no left behind mess, and now this. Bush thinks Big Government should run education into the ground, but shouldn't be able to help kids who are sick?

I totally don't understand this. Children need medical care! Why doesn't President Bush and some other Senators and Representatives want them to have it?

You don't get it at all. Bush IS NOT against medicine for kids! He hates socialized medicine. People can afford insurance for kids and already have it. This would just take money away from business which means people losing their jobs and giving it to the government. It won't help anybody!

Here's a message for President Bush. Open toilet, insert head, flush.

Dubya is sick, sick, sick.

Don't be too hard on poor President Bush. He's only a puppet.

Who's afraid of the Big Bad Bush?

I'm afraid!

Health insurance companies do not make excessive profits, they make less money by percentage than almost all other types of business.

If the current adminstration wants them to get that care through private insurers, then they can subsidize those insurers, control rates, or cut taxes so that people can afford it.