« March 2010 | Main | May 2010 »

April 23, 2010

Colorado Court Overturns Campus Concealed Gun Ban

Girls Gun Club photo is from the El Paso High School Yearbook, El Paso, Texas (1923)

The Colorado Court of Appeals ruled that University of Colorado students who have a permit to carry concealed weapons can now carry them on campus. In February, Colorado State University decided not to allow such students to carry guns, but that may now be overturned. There was probably a lot of cheering by gun groups in Colorado as well as by some students and teachers.

In their wisdom, officials at Colorado State University decided on the ban because they were worried about another Columbine or Virginia Tech happening. I mean imagine you are a teacher and you decide to flunk a student and he has a gun. Or worse, you decide not to give an honors student an A and give him a B+ instead, and he has a hidden weapon. I hope you made out your will. It is a jungle in the school with all the competition. But I'm talking about USC, Syracuse, and Miami, not Colorado.

The student body of Colorado State University at Fort Collins had raised a roar over the gun policy. Sophomore David Ambrose said, "Banning guns on campus make students second class citizens compared with the rest of Colorado." Colorado is a rural state and many students and faculty are hunters. I have nothing against hunting or owning guns. There is definitely a cowboy mentality in Colorado. I can understand that you might want to do a little quail hunting before class and you want to drive directly to college. But carrying a concealed weapon to class, even with a permit, is just wrong.

Most campuses across the nation have weapons restrictions on campus, including some conservative states. Oh well we can't win them all.

Here are the sources.

http://www.thedenverchannel.com/news/23161698/detail.html


http://articles.latimes.com/2009/dec/28/nation/la-na-guns-campus28-2009dec28 

The photo is taken from the 1923 El Paso High School Yearbook, El Paso, Texas and shows the high school Girls Gun Club. As far as we know it's public domain.

Vernon Avaritt wants to thank Danacasso and Alden Loveshade for help with this report. But understand that the opinions expressed in this entry represent those of Vern.

[ Yahoo! ] options

April 22, 2010

The Real American Tea Party

http://graphics8.nytimes.com/images/2009/04/15/us/16teaparty2_600.JPG (photo by Doug Mills/The New York Times)Like it or not, but often the more political power you have, the less likely you are to let people know what you're really after.  You may even de-emphasize who you really are.

People in the emerging Tea Party movement encourage others to "Join the fight for liberty" and be a "patriot."  They describe themselves as part of as a "populist" or "grassroots" movement, representing the vast majority of America.

They hearken back to the 18th century Boston Tea Party protest against taxation without representative--an event that fueled the American Revolution and a violent break from the British government.  Last year the Republican Governor of Texas, Tea Party activist Rick Perry, even went so far as to hint that Texas could split from the Union.  But he backtracked by saying no such thing was planned, and that he loved America.

Now a poll by The New York Times has found who the Tea Party members are--and this is directly from them.  (And for those who don't know, the Tea Party is not a political party in the sense that the Democratic Party, Republican Party, Libertarian Party or Green Party are.  At least not yet.) 

They are generally affluent, and not suffering economically like much of the rest of the country.  They are also Republican and conservative, and many see little difference between the Tea Party and the Republican Party--except that many of them want to weed out less conservative Republicans.  They also tend to be over the age of 45, male, married, and white.

Image is at http://wwwimage.cbsnews.com/images/2009/04/16/image4949606x.jpg (photo by CBS/Brian Montopoli)And, according to their own responses, the largely affluent members think the current system gives too much help to the poor.  And the primarily white members are more likely than most Americans, even than most Republicans, to think too much focus has been spent on the problems of blacks.  In fact they are more than twice as likely as the average American to think the current administration favors blacks over whites.

See two articles about the poll at http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2010/04/14/us/politics/20100414-tea-party-poll-graphic.html and at http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/15/us/politics/15poll.html

Photo by Doug Mills for The New York Times is from http://graphics8.nytimes.com/images/2009/04/15/us/16teaparty2_600.JPG and photo by Brian Montopoli for CBS is at http://wwwimage.cbsnews.com/images/2009/04/16/image4949606x.jpg No threat to their respective copyright is intended.

Entries by persons who are members or associates of The Loveshade Family do not necessarily represent the views of the whole family.

[ Yahoo! ] options

April 12, 2010

Journalistic Ethics, Exposing Sources and Pedophilia

No threat to Coppertone's copyright is intended.

Journalists are facing a modern-day version of an old challenge.  Should journalists leave behind their "fair and balanced" ethics to expose a crime (or sell their product), or abandon the confines of journalism all together and move from informers to informants?

Traditional journalistic ethics are being challenged in France because of an installment on the series Les Infiltrés called "Pedophiles: The Predators."  In it, reporter Laurent Richard pretended online to be variously a 12-year-old girl and a man who was sexually interested in children.  He communicated with several people who collected child pornography, then traveled to Montreal and met a man he later turned in.  In terms of traditional journalistic ethics, this could be seen a betrayal of the confidentiality of his source.

Some may have the reaction of "So what if he violated some abstract ethics?  He caught somebody."  The problem here is the challenge to journalistic ethics and to the nature of journalism itself, which can have a tremendous effect on what the public learns.  People's safety, health and even lives can and have been dependent on information journalists gained from confidential sources.

In some parts of the world, journalists have legal protection that won't allow the courts to force them to betray their sources.  In other parts of the world such as the United States, they aren't always protected, and journalists have gone to jail for standing by their ethics of keeping a source confidential.  In this case, the revelation was planned.

These ethics are not just some abstraction: they are very practical and vital to keeping the public informed.  Any time you see an article that says, "an unidentified source," that source is trusting the ethics of the journalist that his or her identity will not be revealed.  A reporter who betrays that confidence will lose not only that contact, but many other potential sources.  This means that the public may never learn about possible dangers in their health care, the safety of their automobiles, corruption in their representatives, or other threats to their personal welfare because critical sources will dry up.

A classic case in America is the exposure of the politically-motivated cover-up of the 1972 break-in at the Democratic National Committee headquarters at the Watergate complex in Washington, D.C.  Originally, the break-in was little known.  Perhaps more importantly is that the connection between the break-in, the campaign to re-elect American President Richard M. Nixon, and an effort to cover up that connection were unknown.

But a source known for over three decades only as "Deep Throat" revealed it, and Nixon resigned as a result, the first and so-far only such resignation in American history.  Several prominent officials were convicted largely because of the reporting and information from this secret source.  Had William Mark Felt, Sr. feared his real identity would be exposed by the journalists that knew it, the Watergate scandal might never have been exposed.

Chris Hansen, former host of To Catch a PredatorIn another example, the mixing of journalism and police work on America's Dateline NBC segment To Catch a Predator led by Chris Hansen led to a suicide.  Texas District Attorney Louis William "Bill" Conradt Jr. killed himself when a SWAT team and Dateline entered his home in a child pornography/predator investigation.

A major impetus for the investigation was supposed changes in Conradt's Myspace pages, but Hansen later admitted he had never even seen them.  In Texas, it's possible to get 20 years in prison and become a lifetime registered sex offender for possessing and showing images that would be considered legal in many other parts of America and even other parts of Texas, but that's a separate issue. 

Some may ask, "But in those cases the sources didn't know they were talking to a journalist anyway."  That may be true.  But as more people learn that some professional journalists will expose their sources, then might they not fear that any professional journalist they want to confidentially tell vital information might betray them?

On a personal note, I am in an unusual position because I've been both a salaried journalist and a freelance investigator.  But I kept those activities separate.  As a journalist, I knew that if I was ever ordered to reveal my sources, I would face the threat of jail rather than make that betrayal.  As happens with many journalists, I have been threatened.

Private citizens and unlicensed investigators have been a significant help in a number of investigations.  And so have journalists whose reporting is "fair and balanced" and who keep their sources confidential.  But I hope we will work to keep those areas separate, and move away from an "infotainment" trend where deception and scandal-mongering are accepted as long as they make money. Learn more at http://www.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,1981057,00.html

No threat is intended to any copyright of the Coppertone girl representing Coppertone, a product of the Schering-Plough Corporation, nor to the photo of Chris Hansen.

Entries by persons who are members or associates of The Loveshade Family do not necessarily represent the views of the whole family.

[ Yahoo! ] options

April 09, 2010

The Student Non-Discrimination Act

Preprom taken by Ken Stokes on May 20, 2005You may have read our entry about the discrimination against high school student Constance McMillen who wanted to attend her high school prom. Her situation got even worse.

Constance wanted to go to her Mississippi high school prom with her girlfriend, but the school refused to allow it. After the ACLU filed a lawsuit on her behalf, a federal judge said the The Itawamba County Agricultural High School could not discriminate against her attending a school-sponsored prom as that violated her First Amendment rights. The school board's response? Rather that let her attend with a female, they cancelled the prom for everyone.

But the fight against Constance and personal freedom got even worse. The judge was assured that she would be allowed to attend a private dance that would serve as the school prom. But the only students who showed up were Constance, her date, and five other students. Two of those students had disabilities. The "real" prom was held somewhere else.

We will respect the wishes of Constance and the ACLU and not focus all of our outrage on the cruelty here. James Esseks, director of the LGBT Project, said "there's nothing she wants more than for these kind of hurtful actions to end for students all across the country." We cannot change what happened to Constance, but we can support the Student Non-Discrimination Act to prevent this happening to future prom-goers.

Esseks said, "The Student Non-Discrimination Act would be the first comprehensive federal prohibition against discrimination in public schools based on a student's sexual orientation or gender identity."

You can help by sending an email in support of the act by going to https://secure.aclu.org/site/Advocacy?cmd=display&page=UserAction&id=2207&s_src=UNW100001ACT&s_subsrc=100409_const_CAN&JServSessionIdr004=8jp5gu9q75.app224a

Read more at http://www.yppo.com/2010/04/09/constance-mcmillen-fake-prom/

Preprom photo taken by Ken Stokes on May 20, 2005 and is released under the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 license as found at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Preprom.jpg

- - - - -

To see all our entries dealing with the ACLU, click on http://www.loveshade.org/blog-mt/mt-search.fcgi?IncludeBlogs=1&search=aclu

To see all our entries dealing with the Student Non-Discrimination Act (including our first entry on Constance McMillen), click on http://www.loveshade.org/blog-mt/mt-search.fcgi?IncludeBlogs=1&search=student non-discrimination act

[ Yahoo! ] options

April 01, 2010

Nuke Japan

No threat is intended to the image of Nick Levasseur found at http://images.huffingtonpost.com/gen/152635/thumbs/s-NICK-LEVASSEUR-APOLOGY-large.jpgNew Hampshire State Representative Nick Levasseur wrote on Facebook. "Anime is a prime example of why two nukes just wasn't enough". This is a stupid and insensitive remark. Nuking Japan was a horrible thing that we had to do and it is extremely insensitive to make light of it. I don't know what else to say. It was a stupid comment so let it be.

As for Anime. In Japan EVERYBODY watches anime. In the US only children watch cartoon but that is changing. In Japan they make Anime for everybody! They make Pokemon and Card Captor Sakura for kids. They make Naruto and Bleach for young adults. They make Claymore for older adults. They make Urotsukidoji for "Mature" adults. Anime can be X-rated and that freaks out people in the US who think the Japanese are perverts. This is not true. The Japanese won't let children see X-rated Anime just like Americans won't. It is a culture difference.

Most of the world doesn't have the puritanical ideas about sex that we have. On the other hand, we embrace violence which the reat of the world does not. We are very warped in our own way.

Oh well! Have a great day.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/03/27/nick-levasseur-apology-an_n_516058.html

No threat is intended to the copyright of the image of Nick Levasseur found at http://images.huffingtonpost.com/gen/152635/thumbs/s-NICK-LEVASSEUR-APOLOGY-large.jpg

Entries by persons who are members or associates of The Loveshade Family do not necessarily represent the views of the whole family.

[ Yahoo! ] options

Zoey Zane Declared Discordian Saint; Killer Gets Life

Israel Mireles (photo from http://blogs.kansascity.com/.a/6a00d83451b1b869e2012877966705970c-320wi)Israel Mireles, 26, the man convicted of killing and raping the 18-year-old Emily Sander, got life in prison without the possibility of parole.  Had Mexico not refused to deport him unless the United States of "We like to kill people in" America promised not to kill him, he probably would have gotten the death penalty.  Then he would have sat on Death Row for 20 years at a cost of millions of dollars.

Synchronistically, on the same day, 31 March 2010, Zoey Zane (the modeling name of Sander) was declared a Discordian Saint.  Emily Sander had already been named a Discordian American PriEmily Sander (image from family)ncess.

As this may be our last entry on Emily Sander/Zoey Zane, I'll let you know we were the first website (other than that of the local Kansas paper) to report that Emily was missing before it was revealed she posed nude as Zoey Zane.  Our friend Perlie the Pony Girl was friends with Emily and knew about the double identity, but didn't want to hurt the family.  But the organized media called Emily a "porn star" and still insists on calling her a "pornography model," even though almost all her poses were relatively tame.

Had she not posed, almost everyone who's read the story would not have heard of her.  And that's a shame.

- - - - -

LINKS

Emily Sander tribute: http://discordia.loveshade.org/xtra/emily.html

Israel Mireles' sentence: http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-504083_162-20001552-504083.html

Discordian American Princesses: http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Discordian+American+Princess and http://uncyclopedia.wikia.com/wiki/Category:Discordian_American_Princesses

To see all our entries on Emily Sander, click on http://www.loveshade.org/blog-mt/mt-search.fcgi?IncludeBlogs=1&search=emily+sander

Entries by persons who are members or associates of The Loveshade Family do not necessarily represent the views of the whole family.

[ Yahoo! ] options